When to Use Asset Finance vs. a Hire Purchase Agreement

Asset finance and hire purchase agreements are two financing options that businesses can use to acquire new assets. However, it is important to understand the differences between the two and the situations in which they are best used. In this blog, we will discuss when to use asset finance vs. a hire purchase agreement.

Asset finance

Asset finance is a type of financing that enables businesses to acquire assets without having to pay the full amount upfront. Instead, the business will make regular payments over an agreed period of time. The asset being financed is used as security for the loan. The most common types of assets that are financed in this way are vehicles, machinery, and equipment.

Asset finance is best used when a business needs to acquire an asset quickly but does not have the cash available to purchase it outright. By using asset finance, the business can make regular payments over a longer period of time, making it easier to manage cash flow. Asset finance is also a good option for businesses that do not want to tie up their capital in depreciating assets.

For example, a delivery company may need to purchase a fleet of vehicles to expand its operations. By using asset finance, the company can acquire the vehicles it needs without having to pay the full amount upfront. This enables the company to expand its operations without tying up its capital in vehicles that will depreciate over time.

Hire purchase

A hire purchase agreement, on the other hand, is a type of financing that enables businesses to acquire an asset by paying for it in installments. Once the business makes all payments, they will own the asset, which serves as security for the agreement.

A hire purchase agreement, on the other hand, is best used when a business wants to own the asset at the end of the agreement. This is particularly useful for assets that have a long lifespan, such as machinery or equipment. By using a hire purchase agreement, the business can spread the cost of the asset over a longer period of time, making it easier to manage cash flow.

For example, a manufacturing company may want to purchase a new piece of machinery that will be used in its production process for many years. By using a hire purchase agreement, the company can acquire the machinery it needs without having to pay the full amount upfront. The company will own the machinery at the end of the agreement, making it a valuable asset for the business.

Implications: Asset Finance vs. a Hire Purchase

There are also tax implications to consider when choosing between asset finance and a hire purchase agreement. With asset finance, the business can claim tax relief on the interest payments made on the loan. With a hire purchase agreement, the business can claim capital allowances on the asset being purchased.

It is also important to consider the overall cost of the financing options. Asset finance typically has higher interest rates than hire purchase agreements, so businesses will need to weigh up the cost of financing over the life of the agreement.

In conclusion, both asset finance and hire purchase agreements are useful financing options for businesses looking to acquire assets. When a business needs to acquire an asset quickly without tying up its capital, it’s best to use asset finance. On the other hand, when a business wants to own the asset at the end of the agreement, a hire purchase agreement is the best option. When deciding between the two, businesses should consider the tax implications and overall cost of the financing options. Ultimately, the specific needs of the business and the asset being acquired determine the choice.

Get in touch with us at Funding Bay for your business financing needs.

Check out our Asset Finance Calculator.